mcf 10a cells (ATCC)
Structured Review

Mcf 10a Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 8332 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mcf 10a cells/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 8332 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Unravelling the anti-cancer mechanisms elicited by non-covalent thioredoxin reductase inhibitors for triple negative breast cancer therapy"
Article Title: Unravelling the anti-cancer mechanisms elicited by non-covalent thioredoxin reductase inhibitors for triple negative breast cancer therapy
Journal: Redox Biology
doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2025.103980
Figure Legend Snippet: TXNRD(i)s increase redox stress which do not correlate with cell viability. A. Gene set enrichment analysis of Oxidative Stress Response gene set by WikiPathways. NES and nominal p-value were determined by the GSEA software. B. Redox stress quantification using H 2 DCFDA by flow cytometry of MDA-MB-231 (top) (n = 2), HCC1806 (middle) (n = 3), and MCF-10A (bottom) (n = 3) cells. Cells were treated with 10 μM 8VP101 for 0, 2, 6,18, and 24 h, harvested and incubated with 1 μM H 2 DCFDA for 15 min. Representative histograms (left) of measured DCF mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) with the grey peak representing unstained control. Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired t -test relative to 0-h time point. C. Cell viability determined by crystal violet. MDA-MB-231 (top), HCC1806 (middle), and MCF-10A (bottom) cells treated with 10 μM 8VP101 for 24 h. Cells were fixed and stained with crystal violet, then solubilized and absorption values are normalized to vehicle control set as 100 %. Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired t -test. Data is presented as the mean±sem. ∗p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗p ≤ 0.005; ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001; ∗∗∗∗p ≤ 0.0001; ns: not significant.
Techniques Used: Software, Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Fluorescence, Control, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: Treatment with TXNRD(i)s inhibits cells proliferation and disrupts cells cycle by inducing G1 arrest and reducing S phase . A. Gene set enrichment analysis of DNA Replication by Gene Ontology Biological Processes. NES and nominal p-value were determined by GSEA software. B. EdU incorporation assay by flow cytometry of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with 4 μM or 10 μM 8VP101 for 24 h and loaded with 1 μM EdU for 3 h before harvest and analysis. Representative histograms of EdU incorporation are shown on the left. Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired t -test. C. Gene expression by RT-QPCR in MDA-MB-231 cells treated with 10 μM 8VP101 for 24 h. Relative gene expression is calculated using the ΔΔCt method normalized to β-actin. Statistical significance was determined by an unpaired t -test. D. Cell cycle analysis using PI by flow cytometry of MDA-MB-231 (top), HCC1806 (middle), and MCF-10A (bottom) cells. Cells were treated with 4 μM or 10 μM 8VP101 for 24 h. Statistical significance was determined by Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunns test. E. Protein levels of p21 assessed by western blot. MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with 10 μM 8VP101 for 6 h. β-actin was used as the loading control. Data is presented as the mean±sem. ∗p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗p ≤ 0.005; ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001; ns: not significant.
Techniques Used: Software, Flow Cytometry, Gene Expression, Quantitative RT-PCR, Cell Cycle Assay, Western Blot, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: TXNRD(i)s inhibit TXNRD1 and TXNRD2 enzymes and both enzymes are critical for growth of TNBC cells. A. HCC1806 cells were pretreated with 8VP101 or vehicle control for 1 h, then treated with 10 μM of TRFS-green for 4 h, followed by incubation with MitoTracker-red. Live cells were imaged on a Nikon Ti2E inverted microscope at 20x. Representative images shown. Cytosolic and mitochondrial TXNRD activity on average intensity per cell per field basis was quantified for 4 μM 8VP101 treatment. Average intensity was calculated from n = 3 biological replicates and n = 9 technical replicates. ∗∗∗∗p ≤ 0.0001. B. MDA-MB-231, HCC1806 and MCF-10A cells were transfected with siNeg, siTXNRD1, siTXNRD2, or both siTXNRD1 and siTXNRD2, 10 nM each, and monitored for cell growth every 12 h over 120 h using BioTek BioSpa. Data is shown as fold change normalized to the initial timepoint. Growth curves are averages −/+ sem from n = 3 biological replicates. End-point statistical significance was determined. ∗∗p ≤ 0.005; ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001; ∗∗∗∗p ≤ 0.0001. C. MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with DMSO, 8VP101 or 9VP19 at 10 μM each and monitored for cells growth as in (B). End-point statistical significance was determined. ∗∗∗∗p ≤ 0.0001. D. Cell cycle analysis using PI by flow cytometry of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were transfected with 10 nM siTXNRD1, 10 nM siTXNRD2, or a combination of 10 nM siTXNRD1 and 10 nM siTXNRD2 for 24 h. Statistical significance was determined by Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunns test comparing siTXNRD1, siTXNRD2, and both siTXNRD1 and siTXNRD2 to siNeg control. Data is presented as the mean±sem. ∗p ≤ 0.05; ns: not significant.
Techniques Used: Control, Incubation, Inverted Microscopy, Activity Assay, Transfection, Cell Cycle Assay, Flow Cytometry


